Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref: change prices #926

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

ref: change prices #926

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

fricoben
Copy link
Contributor

@fricoben fricoben commented Nov 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated pricing structure for domain services with new values for ONE, TWO, and THREE.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted pricing to reflect more accurate values for domain purchases.

@fricoben fricoben added the 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review label Nov 25, 2024
@fricoben fricoben requested a review from irisdv November 25, 2024 08:18
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
app-starknet-id ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 25, 2024 8:19am
sepolia-app-starknet-id ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 25, 2024 8:19am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the PRICES constant in the utils/priceService.ts file by updating the values for the keys ONE, TWO, and THREE to new BigInt values. The constants FOUR and FIVE remain unchanged. No alterations were made to function signatures, logic, error handling, or return values of the existing functions, which continue to operate as before.

Changes

File Change Summary
utils/priceService.ts Updated PRICES constant values: ONE, TWO, THREE changed to new BigInt values; FOUR, FIVE unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant PriceService

    Client->>PriceService: Request price for ONE
    PriceService-->>Client: Return updated price for ONE

    Client->>PriceService: Request price for TWO
    PriceService-->>Client: Return updated price for TWO

    Client->>PriceService: Request price for THREE
    PriceService-->>Client: Return updated price for THREE
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
utils/priceService.ts (1)

5-7: Consider updating documentation to reflect the significant price changes.

The prices have been reduced significantly (57-79% decrease). Consider adding a comment explaining the reasoning or linking to relevant documentation.

Add a comment above the PRICES constant:

+// Updated prices as of <DATE> to reflect new pricing strategy
+// See <LINK_TO_DOCS> for more details
export const PRICES = {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3db5c49 and f737bae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • utils/priceService.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/priceService.ts (2)

5-7: LGTM! Price constant updates maintain correct BigInt usage and value hierarchy.

The new prices maintain the logical progression where longer domains are cheaper, and the BigInt type is correctly used.

Let's verify if any tests or documentation need updating with these new prices:

✅ Verification successful

Price constant updates are safe to merge, no test updates needed

The test suite is well-designed and doesn't rely on hardcoded price values. Instead, it:

  • Uses the PRICES constant directly from the service
  • Tests price calculations through relative comparisons
  • Validates pricing logic and relationships rather than specific values

Components using the price service only use helper functions like getDisplayablePrice and don't contain hardcoded values.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and documentation that might reference the old prices
rg -l "801369863013699|657534246575343|160000000000000" --type ts --type md

# Search for any price-related test files
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg -l "price"

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find price-related tests and documentation

# Search for test files containing "price" case-insensitive
rg -il "price" -g "*.test.ts" -g "*.spec.ts"

# Search for files importing or using priceService
rg -l "priceService" 

# Search for documentation files mentioning pricing
rg -l "price" -g "*.md"

# Search for any BigInt price constants in the codebase
rg -l "BigInt\(.*\)" -g "*.ts"

Length of output: 870


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the price-related test file to see if it needs updating
cat tests/utils/priceService.test.js

# Let's also check the components that directly use priceService to see if they have any hardcoded values
rg -A 5 "priceService" components/domains/registerSummary.tsx components/discount/freeRegisterSummary.tsx

Length of output: 10043


5-7: Verify frontend displays and calculations with new price points.

Since these are significant price reductions, ensure that:

  1. Any hardcoded price checks in the UI are updated
  2. Price formatting and display components can handle the new lower values
  3. Any analytics or monitoring systems are aware of the expected price range change
✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification response. The codebase shows extensive price-related functionality with proper handling of price formatting and display:

Frontend price handling is well-implemented across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  1. Price formatting is handled by getDisplayablePrice function which properly formats prices with 3 decimal places
  2. Price display components (like RegisterSummary) handle both ETH and alternative currency displays
  3. UI tests verify price formatting and calculations
  4. Analytics tracking is implemented through price-related state management

The changes to the price constants are safe as:

  • All price displays use proper formatting functions
  • Price calculations are done using BigInt to handle the precise values
  • Tests verify price calculations and formatting
  • The UI components handle both regular and discounted prices appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential hardcoded price checks or price-related components
rg -A 5 "price|Price" --type tsx --type jsx

# Look for test files containing price assertions
ast-grep --pattern 'expect($_).toBe($price)' 

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential hardcoded price checks or price-related components in all JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg -A 5 "price|Price" --type js --type ts

# Look for test files containing price-related assertions
rg -A 5 "price|Price" ".*\.(test|spec)\.(js|ts)"

# Search for files that might contain price formatting or display logic
rg -A 5 "formatPrice|displayPrice|renderPrice" --type js --type ts

# Look for any analytics or monitoring related to prices
rg -A 5 "(analytics|monitor|track).*price" --type js --type ts -i

Length of output: 102568

Copy link
Collaborator

@irisdv irisdv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@irisdv irisdv merged commit 29fdde7 into testnet Nov 25, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants